Browse the?THE?Japan University Rankings 2019 results

The ³ÉÈËVRÊÓƵ Japan University Rankings use a balanced scorecard approach, with 16 individual performance indicators combining to create an overall score that reflects the broad strength of an institution. The overall methodology explores four key areas, which we call pillars:

Resources

This pillar includes metrics on finance (income) per student (8%), which shows whether the institution has the money to effectively deliver teaching, and the ratio of faculty members to students (8%), which gives a sense of whether the college has enough teachers to teach. We also look at the scholarly output (7%)?and research grants per member of staff?(5%) at each institution. Having faculty who are experts in their academic fields can significantly enhance a student¡¯s educational experience. The final metric measures the national mock university exam scores (6%) received by institutions¡¯ entrants to get an indication of the academic calibre required to gain admission to a particular university and its popularity among top students.

Engagement

This pillar measures opinions of the university from two sources: the High School Advisors Survey, and the Japan Student Survey. The High School Advisors Survey gathers the views of student careers advisers from almost 2,400 Japanese secondary schools. It asks advisers to name the top 15 universities that they believe teach students to the highest global standards (6%), and the 15 universities that they think are best at developing students¡¯ abilities (6%). This year, we are also using data from our student survey (see file below), which is based on the same model used in our other Teaching Rankings (US, Europe). Responses to seven questions are used in three metrics in the following manner:

• The engagement metric (6%)?uses scores from four questions, asking how much the university supports (1) critical thinking, (2) making connections among the things that the student has learnt, (3) applying the students¡¯ learning to the real world and (4) offers classes that are challenging the students.
• The interaction metric (6%)?uses scores from two questions, asking how many opportunities the students had to (1) interact with the staff and faculty and (2) collaborate with their peers.
• The recommendation metric?(6%)?uses scores from one question, which asks how likely students would be to recommend their university to friends or family.

Outcomes

This pillar looks at the overall academic reputation (8%) of the university in Japan, based on votes from Japanese scholars in °Õ±á·¡¡¯s annual Academic Reputation Survey of leading academics worldwide, which helps us to determine which institutions have the best reputation for excellence in teaching. We also consider the reputation of the university among employers (8%) to get a sense of whether the university produces graduates the market wants. This is based on a survey of human resources departments from 847 listed and non-listed companies. Each department was asked to identify the 10 best universities based on the strengths of their employees from those institutions. Each department then completed a survey for each of the 10 universities that it identified, rating the employees from these institutions in several areas.

³ÉÈËVRÊÓƵ

Environment

This pillar looks at the make-up of the student and staff body at each campus, helping students to determine whether they will find themselves in a diverse, supportive and inclusive university environment. We examine the proportion of international students (5%) and international staff?(5%) on campus, which are key indicators of whether the university is able to attract talent from across the world. It also demonstrates which institutions have cultivated a multicultural campus where students from different backgrounds have the opportunity to learn from one another. We are also looking at two dimensions of internationalisation: the number of students in various types of international exchange programmes?(5%), and the number of courses taught in a language other than Japanese?(5%).

Notable methodology changes

We have changed the following since last year¡¯s ranking:

³ÉÈËVRÊÓƵ

• The Engagement pillar now includes three new metrics, all based on the results of our student survey.
• The metric weightings in the Engagement and Outcomes pillars were reviewed to accommodate the addition of the three new metrics.

Explore our portfolio of global university rankings

Data for the rankings come from a variety of sources. These include self-submitted data from the institutions themselves as well as data gathered from Elsevier, Benesse Corporation, Nikkei Human Resources, the Japanese government and the ³ÉÈËVRÊÓƵ Academic Reputation?Survey. Our data are, in most cases, normalised so that the value we assign in each metric can be compared sensibly with other metrics. The?calculation of the THE Japan University Rankings has been subject to independent audit by professional services firm PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC).?Read more about the PwC/³ÉÈËVRÊÓƵ Japan University Rankings 2019 report here.