An editing error in the second sentence of Charles Townshend's article last week altered the meaning. The sentence should have read: "It was a proposal that was deeply subversive of the British legal tradition and was based on the premise that the civil liberty of the majority... should outweigh that of the minority."
Register to continue
Why register?
- Registration is free and only takes a moment
- Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
- Sign up for our newsletter
Subscribe
Or subscribe for unlimited access to:
- Unlimited access to news, views, insights & reviews
- Digital editions
- Digital access to 罢贬贰’蝉 university and college rankings analysis
Already registered or a current subscriber? Login