成人VR视频

Russell Group ‘not immune’ as King’s, Nottingham post deficits

King’s College London reported an operating deficit of ?19 million once the impact from pensions and donations are excluded

十二月 20, 2024
Avalanche
Source: iStock/Lysogor

Some leading UK universities have reported operating deficits for last year, as financial accounts reveal that?few are “immune from the financial challenges” and falling international student numbers.

The?“volatile” valuation of the Universities Superannuation Scheme (USS) pension fund is massively skewing the final financial positions of most of the sector?– with only about one in 10 of the 64 accounts analysed by?成人VR视频?so far reporting a deficit for 2023-24.

However, around a fifth have?an operating deficit?when those changes are excluded?– with the largest of those so far at King’s College London.

?reveal an “extraordinary” surplus of ?326.7 million as a result of the USS – but this falls to an operating deficit of ?19 million once its impact and donations worth ?24 million are excluded.

“Our operating deficit reflects the acceleration of our spending on strategic investments, and our day-to-day operations showed a financial performance consistent with our plans,” the statements say.

The King’s vice-chancellor Shitij Kapur?reiterated his warnings about the scale of the challenge facing the sector?by?writing that “the period of rapid and sustained growth in international students may be at an end”.

“There are undoubted pressures within UK higher education, and King’s will not be immune from these,” he adds.

King’s increased its tuition fee income by ?23 million year-on-year, but this was still ?40 million below its target – with new admissions the full-time equivalent of 1,400 below plan.

The accounts said that universities operate in a much less certain international world – one in which “ill-considered and inflammatory statements on migration” can create an unwelcoming environment for students.

“If there was a fundamental reversal in the trend of international student recruitment, King’s would be severely financially compromised.”

The institution plans to implement “significant changes” in its student recruitment activities, supplementing its activities in existing mature recruitment markets such as China, and building capacity in others.

The university’s operating deficit fell from a surplus of ?144.9 million the year before, while its net cash inflow from operations fell from ?60.4 million to ?23.9 million.

The University of Nottingham –?another member of the Russell Group?in difficulty – highlights the “significant pressures” across the sector driven primarily by a high inflationary environment.

Nottingham’s adjusted financial position, before pension provisions and interest costs, was a deficit of ?17 million, which included one-off restructuring costs of ?12.1 million.

Nottingham says it has grown its income by increasing its proportion of international postgraduate students, but that its costs had been impacted by cumulative years of high inflation that has far exceeded income growth.

“We at Nottingham are not immune from the financial challenges and this has been compounded by A-level grade deflation and the university focus on recruiting the most talented students in a more challenging and competitive student recruitment environment, which has resulted in lower student numbers than were anticipated,” the?

It reported a surplus for the year of ?220.7 million and a cash inflow from operating activities of ?4.9 million.

Nottingham recently named Jane Norman as its new vice-chancellor after Shearer West departed last month for the University of Leeds. Earlier this year it emerged that Nottingham had begun allowing international students to?enrol with lower entry grades than would usually be permitted, in what was seen as a sign of financial pressures.

The Open University, the UK’s largest distance learning university, reported a second successive year with an operating deficit, of ?10.3 million, after a 4 per cent fall in taught students.

“Like many universities, we are feeling the impact of a crumbling higher education funding model, the damage done to the UK economy by lockdown and a changing consumer market,”?

With many other institutions now focused on flexibility and support for working students, she says the institution’s “proposition is no longer the differentiator it once was”.

However,?with an improvement on its ?25 million operating deficit last year, the OU says its plan to return to surplus was working.

The University of East Anglia,?which has faced years of financial problems, also improved its underlying financial position – from a deficit of ?18.2 million in 2022-23 – but still remains in difficulty.

It reported an improvement, to an operating deficit of ?7.6 million,??was a result of a change in the mix between home and international students and from a voluntary redundancy scheme?that reduced staff numbers.

Elsewhere, “significant drops in the sector’s international income” was also an issue at the University of Huddersfield,??for the year before other gains, and at the University of Bolton, which is being renamed as the University of Greater Manchester. Reporting a ?3.1 million deficit, it warned of further “tough times ahead”.

patrick.jack@timeshighereducation.com

请先注册再继续

为何要注册?

  • 注册是免费的,而且十分便捷
  • 注册成功后,您每月可免费阅读3篇文章
  • 订阅我们的邮件
注册
Please 登录 or 注册 to read this article.

Reader's comments (4)

Time to slash senior management teams and their associated mini empires. They basically seem to employ teams of people to do the work they are paid to do! The bureaucracy needs to be slashed and slashed again. So much money is wasted and so many of the middle managers are useless with negative value added.
Issues that universities in the UK have at the moment are far more deeply rooted in their business model, than particular single issues to do with pay. Much of the academic cadre spend time in research activity that goes unfunded or partly funded from external sources, while subsidy into time spent on academic research from educational activity both UG and PGTs has been eroded by inflation, fixed fees, and visa restrictions. The current model of university costs is no longer functioning well. A focus on pay to a small number of individuals misses the point and provides a distracting voice for the sector.
I don’t know about these two places in particular, but across UK HE the bloated and parasitic cadre of middle managers sequestering academic staff time to fill in forms and do other pointless paper pushing is bringing the sector down.
new
The middle management have created so many mandatory online courses for academics to complete that it takes days to complete. Hour long courses whose benefit to academics is not always clear. Completion of the online course is now pegged to promotions, so there are more academic hours wasted on training to get promoted. If only we could trim the fat off middle management.
ADVERTISEMENT