Union members at the University of Leicester have voted in favour of a motion of no?confidence in the vice-chancellor in response to the threat of redundancies across the university.
The institution’s University and College Union branch “overwhelmingly voted no?confidence” in Nishan Canagarajah and the institution’s executive board. The motion was put forward in the wake of the announcement that 145 staff were at?risk of redundancy, with about 60 jobs expected to?go.
Several subjects have been targeted for cuts, including medieval and modern languages, political economy and pure maths.
The union branded the decision by university leadership to push ahead with redundancies amid the Covid crisis as “cruel and divisive”.
It also said the branch had unanimously passed a motion to ballot for sustained industrial action to?halt the job?cuts.
Sarah Seaton, chair of the Leicester UCU branch, said “staff are now facing a?triple workload crisis. We were overworked before Covid. Then we struggled through the pandemic, continuing to educate and support our students, even as university managers abandoned hundreds of our casualised colleagues. Now they are threatening 145 more staff with the?chop.
“We are all working around the clock to support our students and each other. The university cannot afford to make any of?us redundant.”
Jo Grady, the UCU general secretary, added that axeing jobs in “the middle of this pandemic is particularly vindictive and self-defeating”.
“In planning to shut down entire courses, the university is also imperilling its international reputation. Singling out specific disciplines for cuts harms academic freedom and will diminish both teaching and research. The vice-chancellor and the executive board must withdraw the threats of redundancies and guarantee the job security of all staff in affected departments,” Dr Grady said.
A Leicester spokeswoman said the university was “naturally disappointed to learn about [the] vote of no?confidence”.
“We are currently in the process of consulting with colleagues about our proposals for change, and want to stress that no?final decisions will be taken until this process comes to an end,” she said.
