A row has broken out in the Netherlands over a contract between one of the country¡¯s top business schools and Royal Dutch Shell that appears to give the oil company influence over curricula and admissions.
The Rotterdam School of Management, part of Erasmus University Rotterdam, is also accused of failing to declare that it was paid more than €300,000 (?259,000) by Shell to produce a report that recommended lowering corporate tax rates to stop multinational companies moving abroad.
The revelations are part of a wide-ranging report ¨C which the school has dismissed as ¡°tendentious¡±, ¡°biased¡± and containing factual errors ¨C by the environmental thinktank Changerism that investigates the links between fossil fuel companies and the school.
It has triggered calls in the Dutch Parliament for a debate about links between fossil fuel companies and universities.
Using freedom of information legislation, Changerism?uncovered a , signed in 2012, that was designed to boost ties between the school and Shell. It commits to establishing a steering group of professors and Shell company managers to ¡°potentially influence the design of the RSM curricula and the profile of students who attend the BSc/MSc/MBA programmes¡±.
Further, it allows Shell to select ¡°experts¡± as speakers, ¡°who will contribute to the students¡¯ understanding of Shell¡±. It also states that ¡°ideally, Shell would be able and willing to feature in the master¡¯s courses of the seven MSc programmes¡± that the oil company was particularly interested in recruiting from.
In response, a ?released by the school says that ¡°companies have no say in education or research¡±.?¡°Neither Shell nor any other company plays a formal part¡± in creating curricula, it says.
The school adds that ¡°of course, external organisations and stakeholders are involved during the accreditation process and programme evaluations¡±. A spokeswoman told ³ÉÈËVRÊÓƵ that the contract promising Shell ¡°influence¡± over curricula was ¡°unfortunate phrasing¡±.
Another of the report¡¯s accusations is that, in 2009, the school carried out a consultation project that looked at the Netherlands¡¯ attractiveness as a base for the headquarters of multinational companies. Shell paid more than €300,000 towards the research, the report claims, but this was never disclosed. The project recommended?that the country cut taxes to prevent multinationals moving abroad. Shell is headquartered in the Netherlands.?
The school¡¯s spokeswoman said that an independent commission would examine the claims in the report, . The school would also make contracts with companies available online, she added.
Changerism argues that any links with the oil industry make RSM ¡°complicit¡± in climate change ¨C an issue of direct relevance to the institution, it observes, pointing out that Erasmus University¡¯s campus is below sea level.
The report blames public funding cuts, and a pursuit of business school rankings that reward high graduate salaries, for creating an environment that increased the pressure for such links.
A Shell?spokesman referred THE to the school¡¯s statement.
